SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND


HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT



The Constitutional DeJure Crown Court
(formerly the Royal Audiencia)
with Absolute Jurisdiction in the
Supreme Law of the Land

1987 Article 1 National Territory
of We the Sovereign Filipino People

1987 Constitution Transition Government


HISTORY AND ROLE
OWNERSHIP
WPS
PEOPLES INITIATIVE

THE INDEPENDENT FILIPINO CROWN PROVIDED IN ARTICLE 18 SECTION 19 WHERE THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION WAS RETURNED IN GR 171913.


EXPLORE THE WEBSITE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE ONLY LAWFUL TRANSITION EMANATING FROM TRUE SOVEREIGNTY.

The Philippine Archipelago referred to in the 1987 Article 1 are those mentioned in the 1935 Article 1.



- Annotation from the 1987 Philippine Constitution Textbook by Hector De Leon


SEE VIDEO AT THIS PAGE

In 1935 Article 1, the limits of the Republic of the Philippines exercising jurisdiction in our National Territory are set forth in Article 3 of the 1898 Treaty of Paris.


SEE VIDEO AT THIS PAGE

In Article 3 of the 1898 Treaty of Paris Diagram, it says that the transfer of our Sovereignty from Spain to US was conducted by US Military Government under the Law of Ownership and only in Interim Status Condition under the Law of Occupation, until legally supplanted by our Indigenous Filipino Government.


SEE VIDEO AT THIS PAGE

THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND



Absolute Fee Simple entered pursuant to Decree 01-4, Protocol of International Law of the Land in accordance with the order of the Royal Audiencia.





ARTICLE 1 NATIONAL TERRIITORY IN THE 1987 PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION​
​

HACIENDA FILIPINA = ANG LUPANG HINIRANG

Hacienda = Estate = Land and Wealth

Filipina = Pili Pino = Finely Chosen


Prescribed in Civil Case 3957-P
Transmitted in GR 171913

THE ROYAL AUDIENCIA IS FINALLY RESTORED BY MAXIM LAW AS THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT WITH EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.


RA 386 ARTICLE 4. RETROACTIVE EFFECT

LEGAL MAXIMS IN THE CONSTITUTION AND ALL ENACTED LAWS PROVIDE A RETROACTIVE EFFECT TO THE RULE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE LAND FOR SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND JURISDICTION AS THE JURISPRUDENCE AND PRINCIPLES OF LAW PRESCRIBED BY THE ROYAL AUDIENCIA FOR APPLICATION TODAY.



RA 8371 Section 15. Justice System, Conflict Resolution Institutions and Peace Building Processes. - The ICCs/IPs shall have the right to use their own commonly accepted justice systems, conflict resolution institutions, peace building processes or mechanisms and other customary laws and practices within their respective communities and as may be compatible with the national legal system and with internationally recognized human rights.

RA 8371 Section 65. When disputes involve International Cultural Community and Indigenous Peoples, customary laws and practices shall be used to resolve the dispute.​


WE ARE THE PROVIDER OF LAW UNDER DIVINE PROVIDENCE

THE CONSTITUTION WAS ALREADY RELINQUISHED BY THE SUPREME COURT THIRD DIVISION FOLLOWING THE RESOLUTION OF OWNERSHIP IN CIVIL CASE 3957-P VESTED IN ARTICLE 1 NATIONAL TERRITORY INSTRUMENTS AS PROOF OF SOVEREIGNTY AND TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY OF THE 1987 CONSTITUTION TRANSITION GOVERNMENT


ARTICLE XVIII SECTION 19

ALL PROPERTIES, RECORDS, EQUIPMENT, BUILDINGS, FACILITIES, AND OTHER ASSETS OF ANY OFFICE OR BODY ABOLISHED OR REORGANIZED UNDER PROCLAMATION NO. 3 DATED MARCH 25, 1986 OR THIS CONSTITUTION SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE OFFICE OR BODY TO WHICH ITS POWERS, FUNCTIONS, AND RESPONSIBILITIES SUBSTANTIALLY PERTAIN.


​RA 386 Article 7. Laws are repealed only by subsequent ones, and their violation or non-observance shall not be excused by disuse, or custom or practice to the contrary. When the courts declared a law to be inconsistent with the Constitution, the former shall be void and the latter shall govern. Administrative or executive acts, orders and regulations shall be valid only when they are not contrary to the laws or the Constitution. (5a)


OUR PEOPLES INITIATIVE FOR CONSTITUTIONAL TRANSITION

THE BANNER OF WORLD PEACE, UNITY AND PROSPERITY UNDER DIVINE PROVIDENCE



THE FLAG, SEALS AND SYMBOLS OF THE NEW NATION ARE RAISED THROUGH SEPARABILITY AND REPEALING CLAUSE OF THE FLAG AND HERALDIC CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES RA 8491 EXPRESSING THE PRINCIPLES OF SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION FOR THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.



ARTICLE II SECTION 7. NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY, NATIONAL INTEREST, AND THE RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION.


EMBRACE THE MOTHERLAND
WEST PHILIPPINES SEA
CHARTER CHANGE

ARTICLE VIII JUDICIARY



Section 1. The judicial power shall be vested in one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as may be established by law.

Section 5.1. The Supreme Court shall have the following powers: Exercise original jurisdiction over cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and over petitions for certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, quo warranto, and habeas corpus.



KINGDOM FILIPINA HACIENDA



Kingdom Filipina Hacienda is the International Cultural Community of Indigenous Peoples under Divine Providence vested in the Philippine Constitution with Tangible & Absolute Proof of Jurisdiction in Article 1 National Territory, the Sovereignty, the International Law, and the World Peace Treaty.

VISIT FACEBOOK

SOVEREIGN REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES



Sovereign Republic of the Philippines is the Constitutional Transition Government for the Philippines declared and decreed by the Royal Sovereign Crown of Kingdom Filipina Hacienda, the Host of All Nations for Turnover of the Republic of the Philippines to the Sovereign Republic of the Philippines.


VISIT FACEBOOK

CITY OF SALVACION



EO 292 of 1987 utilized the Cadastre 292 of the Lone District Charter of Iligan in RA 525 Section 88 now becomes the City of Salvacion as the Central Sovereign Government, Host of the Divine Wealth. It is the Mother Province Capital in 1987 Article XVIII Section 9, identified in Page 51 Treaty of Paris Book Redemption.


VISIT FACEBOOK



PRIVATE RIGHTS OF THE PATRIMONY OF THE NATION



Applying all the Legal Maxims and Principles of Law Transcending all the Lines set by International Powers.


CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES
FOR THE LAND AND WEALTH OF THE LAND

RA 386 Article 712: Ownership is acquired by occupation and by intellectual creation. Ownership and other real rights over property are acquired and transmitted by law, by donation, by testate and intestate succession, and in consequence of certain contracts, by tradition. They may also be acquired by means of prescription



OWNERSHIP, ACQUISITION AND OCCUPATION



Civil Code means Private Rights



The existing Law of Ownership and Occupation vested in Article 1 National Territory of the Philippine Constitution were prescribed in the Civil Code RA 386 Sections 427, 428 & 429. Rights to Ancestral Domain in RA 8371 Sections 4 to 12, and Roles and Creations in RA 7160. Protected with Separability and Repealing Clauses in all enacted laws provided in Article XVIII Section 3 for Redemption.


CESSION DIAGRAM NEW NATION

ROLES AND MANNERS OF CREATION



Local Government Code RA 7160



All 44 Barangays under CADT 292 in Iligan City were consolidated into the New Pala-o Barangay Unit, which composed the City of Salvacion, the Mother Province Capital of the Sovereign Republic of the Philippines provided in Article XVIII Section 9 and the Central Sovereign Government of Kingdom Filipina Hacienda, as the Host of All Nations, identified in Page 51 in Treaty of Paris Book of Redemption.


PAGE 51 CADASTRE 292

TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSION



Civil Case 3957-P & GR 171913



By testate, the Fee Simple, Original Certificate of Title No. T-01-4 entered pursuant to Royal Decree 01-4 Protocol of International Law, was protected in Civil Case 3957-P and acquired by intestate succession resolved and relinquished by the Supreme Court 3rd Division in GR 171913 to Her Majesty Queen Magistrate of the Highest Tribunal Supreme Court, formerly the Royal Audiencia.


CIVIL CASE 3957-P GR 171913

PRESCRIPTION AND TRANSMITTALS



By Constitutional Rule of Law



All Government Agencies are now for strict compliance of DILG Memorandum Circular 2002-89 and Enforcement of Sheriff’s Writ of Execution order for Turnover of Rights Section 52(i) of RA 8371, approved by House of Representatives Committee on Indigenous Cultural Community and Indigenous Peoples for Constitutional Transition provided in Article XVIII Section 19.


DILG HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

THE ROYAL SOVEREIGN CROWN OF THE WORLD PEACE TREATY



The Philippine Archipelago referred to in the 1987 Article 1 are those mentioned in 1935 Article 1. - Annotation from the Article 1 of the 1987 Constitution Textbook by Hector de Leon


The limits of the Republic of the Philippines exercising jurisdiction in our National Territory are set forth in Article 3 of the Treaty of Paris - Article 1 of the 1935


Constitution Republic of the Philippines established by the United States Military Government is only under "Interim Status Condition" under the Law of Ownership and Occupation and will be legally replaced by the 1987 Constitution Transition Government established using the same Article 1 instruments. - Article 3 of the 1898 Treaty of Paris



THE BOOK OF REDEMPTION OF THE WORLD PEACE TREATY



The Secret Book of Redemption of the Treaty of Paris is finally revealed! It redeems God's Supreme Law and Ownership in His Promised Land and all the Wealth of the Land that has long been hidden since time immemorial.


It reveals the Blueprint of the Divine Plan with Definitive Codes of Redemption.


Highest Respect, Honor and Gratitude to Her Majesty Queen Salvacion, the Ark chosen by the Father to fulfill His Covenant in the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land for our Genuine Freedom of National Independence, for World Peace, Unity and Prosperity under Divine Providence.



TREATY OF PARIS IS FACTUALLY, LEGALLY AND HISTORICALLY CORRECT



All territories under treaties subject to International Law are the scope of the World Peace Treaty. In the 2016 South China Sea Arbitration, both the Peoples Republic of China and the Republic of the Philippines are in breach of the UN Charter for having no sufficient proof to substantiate their territorial claim. As confirmed by Justice Carpio, only the maritime dispute was addressed in the 2016 ruling but not a resolution on the territorial dispute because UNCLOS even the International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction in the Law of the Land.

Republic of the Philippines was voided with Article 1 National Territory rights in the 1987 Constitution. It is also a Corporate Government Entity as clearly defined in the Introductory Provisions of Executive Order 292 of 1987.



HRM QUEEN SALVACION LEGASPI y ESPIRITU SANTO

QUEEN OF THE MOTHERLAND

REGENT OF THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE

MAGISTRATE OF THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT

SOVEREIGN PRIME MINISTER OF THE SOVEREIGN REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

HOST OF ALL NATIONS


ALL THE POWER NOW BELONGS TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN SALVACION

1987 ARTICLE XVIII SECTION 3. ALL EXISTING LAWS, DECREES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, PROCLAMATION, LETTERS OF INSTRUCTIONS, AND OTHER EXECUTIVE ISSUANCES NOT INCONSISTENT WITH THIS CONSTITUTION SHALL REMAIN OPERATIVE UNTIL REPEALED, OR REVOKED.

-----

ALL OF US ARE BOUND BY THE CONSTITUTION, BY THE RULE OF LAW AND RULES OF COURT. NO ONE IS ABOVE NOR EXEMPT. WE ARE RESTORING INDIGENOUS SOVEREIGNTY IN OUR MOTHERLAND THROUGH OUR HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT AND OUR QUEEN MAGISTRATE.

WHATEVER THE LAW DECIDES, LET US HONOR IT SINCE THEY ARE FOR THE BEST INTEREST OF THE NATION, THE PEOPLE AND THE GENERATION.



2018 RA 11231 Section 4. This Act shall have retroactive effect and any restriction regarding acquisitions, encumbrances, conveyances, transfers, or dispositions imposed on "free patents as fee simple title" issued under Section 44 of Commonwealth Act No. 141, as amended, before the effectivity of this Act shall be removed and are hereby immediately lifted: Provided, That nothing in this Act shall affect the right of redemption under Section 119 of Commonwealth Act No. 141, as amended, for transactions made in good faith prior to the effectivity of this Act.


RA 386 ARTICLE 4. RETROACTIVE EFFECT

PEOPLES INITIATIVE ON CONSTITUTIONAL CHARTER CHANGE



SOVEREIGNTY RESIDES IN THE PEOPLE AND ALL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITY EMANATES FROM THEM, WITH THE LEGISLATIVE POWER RESERVED TO THE PEOPLE BY INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM IN ARTICLE VI SECTION 1 AND SEPARABILITY IN RA 6735, WE THE SOVEREIGN FILIPINO PEOPLE, OF THE SOVEREIGN REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, DECLARED AND DECREED BY THE SOVEREIGN CROWN KINGDOM FILIPINA HACIENDA AS THE NEW NATION IN ARTICLE XVI SECTION 2, HAVING COMPLIED AND COMPLETED ALL THE REQUISITES IN OWNERSHIP AND OCCUPATION AS THE CONSTITUTIONAL TRANSITIONAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE PHILIPPINES AND THE WORLD.


GO TO PAGE

WEST PHILIPPINES / SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTE RESOLUTION.



HAVING TANGIBLE AND ABSOLUTE PROOF OF SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION, THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT FINALLY SETTLE AND RESOLVE ALL DISPUTES UNDER ROYAL DECREE PROTOCOL 01-4, INCLUDING THIS WEST PHILIPPINE / SOUTH CHINA SEA TENSION, PURSUANT TO ARTICLES 2(3), 33(1), 279 & 289 OF THE UN CHARTER, AND IN PARAGRAPH 813 OF THE 2016 SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRAL AWARD, NOW FOR SOVEREIGN RECOVERY BY THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL FOR WORLD PEACE, UNITY AND PROSPERITY AND FOR AMITY OF ALL NATION UNDER DIVINE PROVIDENCE BY THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.


GO TO PAGE

HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT



THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEJURE CROWN COURT



+63 302-3534 | +63 935-811-4812


HTSC ON FB