WEST PHILIPPINES / SOUTH CHINA SEA
HIGHEST TRIBUNAL RESOLUTION
THE ONLY SOLUTION IN THE WORLD
BY RULE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW
HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT
THE BANNER OF WORLD PEACE
NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY
TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY
NATIONAL INTEREST
SELF-DETERMINATION
INTERNATIONAL LAW IS THE EQUALIZER OF ALL STATES
UNDER ROYAL DECREE 01-4 PROTOCOL
THE CONSTITUTION IS ALREADY TRANSFERRED TO THE 1987 CONSTITUTION TRANSITION GOVERNMENT WITH ABSOLUTE SUBSTANTIAL PROOF OF SOVEREIGNTY AND TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY IN ARTICLE 1.
BY MOTU PROPRIO, THIS DECISION IS FINAL. AND EXECUTORY
IN OUR INDEPENDENT FOREIGN POLICY, THE PARAMOUNT CONSIDERATIONS ARE NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY, NATIONAL INTEREST AND OUR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION. ONLY KINGDOM FILIPINA HACIENDA HAS ALL THE ABSOLUTE SUBSTANTIAL PROOF OF INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS TO PROVE SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.
THEREFORE, BY MOTU PROPRIO, THE RESOLUTION IS TO GATHER ALL STATES TO COME IN PEACE BEFORE THE QUEEN REGENT OF THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE AND QUEEN MAGISTRATE OF THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT, FOR THE FINAL RATIFICATION AND FULFILLMENT OF WORLD PEACE, UNITY AND PROSPERITY, FOR AMITY OF ALL NATIONS, FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.
SECTION 13 OF RA 8371
RIGHT TO SELF-EMPOWER OUR SOVEREIGN CROWN NATION
SECTION 15 OF RA 8371
PEACEFUL RESOLUTION OF THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL
SECTION 65 OF RA 8371
PRIMACY OF HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT
UNDRIP ARTICLE 37
UN DECLARATION OF RIGHTS OF IP
2016 SCS ARBITRATION
CHINA AND RP HAS NO SOVEREIGNTY AND INTEGRITY
UNCLOS ARTICLE 279
OBLIGATIONS TO SETTLE DISPUTES BY PEACEFUL MEANS
UN CHARTER 2 (3)
PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT
UN CHARTER 33 (1)
BY PEACEFUL MEANS OF THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL
UNCLOS ARTICLE 289
EXPERTS
UNCLOS ANNEX VIII
SPECIAL ARBITRATION
ASEAN CHARTER ARTICLE 52
LEGAL CONTINUITY
TAC ARTICLE 17
ASEAN TREATY OF AMITY & COOPERATION
1987 ARTICLE 18 SECTION 3
ALL POWER NOW BELONGS TO THE SOVEREIGNTY
ALL TERRITORIES UNDER TREATIES SUBJECT TO INTERNATIONAL LAW ARE THE SCOPE OF THE WORLD PEACE TREATY.
IN 2016 SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION, BOTH THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ARE IN BREACH OF THE UN CHARTER FOR HAVING NO SUFFICIENT PROOF TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR TERRITORIAL CLAIM.
AS CONFIRMED BY JUSTICE CARPIO, ONLY MARITIME DISPUTE WAS ADDRESSED IN THE 2016 RULING BUT NOT A RESOLUTION ON THE TERRITORIAL DISPUTE BECAUSE UNCLOS EVEN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE HAS NO JURISDICTION IN THE LAW OF THE LAND.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES WAS VOIDED WITH ARTICLE 1 NATIONAL TERRITORY RIGHTS IN THE CONSTITUTION. IT IS ALSO A CORPORATE GOVERNMENT AS CLEARLY DEFINED IN THE EXECUTIVE ORDER 292 OF 1987.
PHILIPPINES IS THE LAND AND WEALTH OF THE LAND, THE PATRIMONY OF THE NATION.
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES IS AN INTERIM GOVERNMENT UNDER THE LAW OF OCCUPATION, ESTABLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES MILITARY GOVERNMENT SINCE THE 1898 PEACE TREATY AND STILL REGISTERED AT UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, TO BE CONSTITUTIONALLY REPLACED WITH THE SOVEREIGN REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, DECLARED AND DECREED BY THE ROYAL SOVEREIGN CROWN RESOLVED BY THE SUPREME COURT IN GR 171913. - Excerpt from Article 3 of the Treaty of Paris Cession Diagram.
HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT
MAXIM LAW
UNIVERSAL LAW
NATURAL LAW
COMMON LAW
GOD'S LAW