SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND


Royal Decree 01-4 Protocol



INTERNATIONAL LAW



ABSOLUTE FEE SIMPLE TITLE PROTECTED UNDER CIVIL CASE 3957-P
RESOLVED BY THE SUPREME COURT THIRD DIVISION IN GR 171913 TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN REGENT MAGISTRATE OF THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT FORMERLY THE ROYAL AUDIENCIA ENABLING THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.


THE ONLY SOLUTION WE OWN
WORLD PEACE TREATY
SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND

"In Rem & Res Judicata"



"All nations subject to treaties, subject to rules-based order, Subject to UN Charter, subject to international law, are exclusive original jurisdiction of the World Peace Treaty"



Ownership vested in Article 1

National Territory of the Philippine Constitution

as the Royal Sovereign Crown Host of All Nations.



THE PROTOCOL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, THE HOST OF ALL NATIONS, THE ORIGIN AND RECEIVER OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM



Absolute Fee Simple entered pursuant to Decree 01-4, Protocol of International Law of the Land AND WEALTH OF THE LAND in accordance with the order of the Royal Audiencia.





CIVIL CODE Section 4. Retroactive Effect provided by Law.​


Prescribed in Civil Case 3957-P
Transmitted in GR 171913

The Philippines renounces war as an instrument of national policy, adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land and adheres to the policy of peace, equality, justice, freedom, cooperation, and amity with all nations.



1987 Constitution Article 2 Section 2





ALL treaties across various regions have shaped international relations under international law. They vary in scope, but all are legally binding under International Law and serve to promote peace, security, and cooperation in their respective regions.


INTERNATIONAL LAW IS NOW UNDER JURISDICTION OF THE SOVEREIGN HOST CROWN
ARTICLE 18 SECTION 9 WHERE THE CONSTITUTION WAS TRANSFERRED
HISTORY AND ROLE OF THE PROTOCOL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW



Abraham Accords



2020 - Middle East



Bilateral agreements on Arab Nations & Israeli normalization



Treaty of Amity & Cooperation



1976 - Southeast Asia



A peace treaty in the ASEAN, a geo-political and economic organization



Treaty of Westphalia



1648 - Europe



Ended the Thirty Years' War and is considered the foundation of modern state sovereignty



Treaty of Versailles



1919 - Europe



Ended World War I and established the League of Nations



Helsinki Accords



1975 - Europe



Promoted peace, security, and cooperation in Europe during the Cold War



Organization of African Unity



1963 - Africa



Focused on peaceful resolution of conflicts within Africa



Lusaka Ceasefire Agreement



1999 - Africa



Helped end the Second Congo War



Treaty of Paris



1783 - North America



Ended the American Revolutionary War and recognized U.S. independence




NAFTA Dispute Settlement



1994 - Americas



Though economic, it promoted peace and stability in trade



Treaty of Tordesillas



1494 - Europe



Divided the New World territories between Spain and Portugal



Itamaraty Peace Process



1994 - Americas



Resolved the Peru-Ecuador border conflict



Shanghai Cooperation



2001 - Central Asia



Focuses on security, peace, and economic cooperation



North Atlantic Treaty



1949 - North Atlantic



Created NATO for mutual defense



World Trade Organization



1995 - Worldwide



Regulates global trade



European Union Treaties



1992 - Europe



Established the EU and its economic policies



Treaty of Rarotonga



1985 - Pacific Region



Establishes the South Pacific Nuclear Free Zone



United Nations Charter



1945 - International



A universal framework for peace and security



Geneva Conventions



1949 - International



Establishes humanitarian standards during armed conflict



Rome Statute



1998 - International



Established the International Criminal Court (ICC) for accountability in conflicts.



Vienna Convention



1969 - Law of Treaties



An international agreement governing treaties between states governed by International Law.



The Philippine Archipelago referred to in the 1987 Article 1 are those mentioned in the 1935 Article 1.



- Annotation from the 1987 Philippine Constitution Textbook by Hector De Leon


SEE VIDEO AT THIS PAGE

In 1935 Article 1, the limits of the Republic of the Philippines exercising jurisdiction in our National Territory are set forth in Article 3 of the 1898 Treaty of Paris.


SEE VIDEO AT THIS PAGE

In Article 3 of the 1898 Treaty of Paris Diagram, it says that the transfer of our Sovereignty from Spain to US was conducted by US Military Government under the Law of Ownership and only in Interim Status Condition under the Law of Occupation, until legally supplanted by our Indigenous Pili Pino Sovereign Host Crown.


SEE VIDEO AT THIS PAGE



HIGHEST TRIBUNAL AND THE
UNITED NATIONS CHARTER





ONLY THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT HAS ABSOLUTE AND SUBSTANTIAL PROOF OF SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND JURISDICTION TO SETTLE ALL DISPUTES UNDER THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. THEREFORE, THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL RESOLVES ALL CONFLICTS BY PEACEFUL MEANS, USING THE WORLD PEACE TREATY, TO BE CONDUCTED BY THE
​★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
QUEEN REGENT OF THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE.
REINSTATING SOVEREIGNTY AND TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY FOR THE AMITY OF ALL NATIONS FOR WORLD PEACE, UNITY AND PROSPERITY UNDER DIVINE PROVIDENCE.


BY MOTU PROPRIO, THIS DECISION IS FINAL. AND EXECUTORY



IN OUR INDEPENDENT FOREIGN POLICY, THE PARAMOUNT CONSIDERATIONS ARE NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY, NATIONAL INTEREST AND OUR RIGHT TO SELF-DETERMINATION. ONLY KINGDOM FILIPINA HACIENDA HAS ALL THE ABSOLUTE SUBSTANTIAL PROOF OF INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS TO PROVE SOVEREIGNTY, TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.

THEREFORE, BY MOTU PROPRIO, THE RESOLUTION IS TO GATHER ALL STATES TO COME IN PEACE BEFORE THE QUEEN REGENT OF THE MINISTRY OF DEFENSE AND QUEEN MAGISTRATE OF THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT, THE ROYAL SOVEREIGN CROWN HOST OF ALL NATIONS, FOR FINAL RATIFICATION AND FULFILLMENT OF WORLD PEACE, UNITY AND PROSPERITY, FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.


HISTORICAL TREATY BOOSTS TERRITORIAL CLAIM

SECTION 13 OF RA 8371



RIGHT TO SELF-EMPOWER OUR SOVEREIGN CROWN NATION





Self-Governance. - The State recognizes the inherent right of ICCs/IPs to self-governance and self-determination and respects the integrity of their values, practices and institutions. Consequently, the State shall guarantee the right of ICCs/IPs to freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.



SECTION 15 OF RA 8371



PEACEFUL RESOLUTION OF THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL





Justice System, Conflict Resolution Institutions and Peace Building Processes. - The ICCs/IPs shall have the right to use their own commonly accepted justice systems, conflict resolution institutions, peace building processes or mechanisms and other customary laws and practices within their respective communities and as may be compatible with the national legal system and with internationally recognized human rights.



SECTION 65 OF RA 8371



PRIMACY OF HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT





When disputes involve International Cultural Community and Indigenous Peoples, customary laws and practices shall be used to resolve the dispute.



UNDRIP ARTICLE 37



UN DECLARATION OF RIGHTS OF IP





Section 1. Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance and enforcement of Treaties, Agreements and Other Constructive Arrangements concluded with States or their successors and to have States honour and respect such Treaties, Agreements and other Constructive Arrangements.

Section 2. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as to diminish or eliminate the rights of Indigenous Peoples contained in Treaties, Agreements and Constructive Arrangements.



UN CHARTER 2 (3)



PEACEFUL SETTLEMENT





2. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as to diminish or eliminate the rights of Indigenous Peoples contained in Treaties, Agreements and Constructive Arrangements.



UN CHARTER 33 (1)



BY PEACEFUL MEANS OF THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL





The parties to any dispute, the continuance of which is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security, shall, first of all, seek a solution by negotiation, enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, judicial settlement, resort to regional agencies or arrangements, or other peaceful means of their own choice.



1987 ARTICLE 18 SECTION 3



ALL POWER NOW BELONGS TO THE SOVEREIGNTY OF HTSC





All existing laws, decrees, executive orders, proclamations, letters of instructions, and other executive issuances not inconsistent with this Constitution shall remain operative until repealed, or revoked.



EX PRESIDENT DUTERTE CASE UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

BY MOTU PROPRIO, THIS DECISION IS FINAL. AND EXECUTORY
HISTORICAL TREATY BOOSTS TERRITORIAL CLAIM

Article 17 Issues of admissibility



ROME STATUTE ARTICLE 17(1)





1. Having regard to paragraph 10 of the Preamble and article 1, the Court shall determine that a case is inadmissible where: (a) The case is being investigated or prosecuted by a State which has jurisdiction over it, unless the State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution;

(b) The case has been investigated by a State which has jurisdiction over it and the State has decided not to prosecute the person concerned, unless the decision resulted from the unwillingness or inability of the State genuinely to prosecute;

(c) The person concerned has already been tried for conduct which is the subject of the complaint, and a trial by the Court is not permitted under article 20, paragraph 3;

(d) The case is not of sufficient gravity to justify further action by the Court.



Article 17 Issues of admissibility



ROME STATUTE ARTICLE 17(2)





2. In order to determine unwillingness in a particular case, the Court shall consider, having regard to the principles of due process recognized by international law, whether one or more of the following exist, as applicable:

(a) The proceedings were or are being undertaken or the national decision was made for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal responsibility for crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court referred to in article 5;

(b) There has been an unjustified delay in the proceedings which in the circumstances is inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice;

(c) The proceedings were not or are not being conducted independently or impartially, and they were or are being conducted in a manner which, in the circumstances, is inconsistent with an intent to bring the person concerned to justice.



Article 17 Issues of admissibility



ROME STATUTE ARTICLE 17(3)





3. In order to determine inability in a particular case, the Court shall consider whether, due to a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of its national judicial system, the State is unable to obtain the accused or the necessary evidence and testimony or otherwise unable to carry out its proceedings.​



Article 125 Signature, ratification, acceptance, approval or accession



ROME STATUTE





1. This Statute shall be open for signature by all States in Rome, at the headquarters of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, on 17 July 1998. Thereafter, it shall remain open for signature in Rome at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Italy until 17 October 1998. After that date, the Statute shall remain open for signature in New York, at United Nations Headquarters, until 31 December 2000.


2. This Statute is subject to ratification, acceptance or approval by signatory States. Instruments of ratification, acceptance or approval shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.


3. This Statute shall be open to accession by all States. Instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.



Article 126 Entry into force



ROME STATUTE





1. This Statute shall enter into force on the first day of the month after the 60th day following the date of the deposit of the 60th instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession with the Secretary-General of the United Nations.


2. For each State ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to this Statute after the deposit of the 60th instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession, the Statute shall enter into force on the first day of the month after the 60th day following the deposit by such State of its instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession.



SOUTH CHINA / WEST PHILIPPINES SEA TENSION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW

BY MOTU PROPRIO, THIS DECISION IS FINAL. AND EXECUTORY
HISTORICAL TREATY BOOSTS TERRITORIAL CLAIM

2016 SCS ARBITRATION



CHINA AND RP HAS NO SOVEREIGNTY AND INTEGRITY





Paragraph 813. With respect to the Philippines’ claim that China’s actions at Scarborough Shoal represented a specific failure to fulfil its duties pursuant to Article 2(3) of the UN Charter and Article 279 of the Convention to settle disputes by peaceful means, the Tribunal notes that both Parties found fault with the other in their handling of the standoff and that both found cause to allege breaches of the UN Charter. The Tribunal does not find the record before it sufficient to support such a claim in respect of either Party.




TAC ARTICLE 17



ASEAN TREATY OF AMITY & COOPERATION





Nothing in this Treaty shall preclude recourse to the modes of peaceful settlement contained in Article 33(l) of the Charter of the United Nations. The High Contracting Parties which are parties to a dispute should be encouraged to take initiatives to solve it by friendly negotiations before resorting to the other procedures provided for in the Charter of the United Nations.




ASEAN CHARTER ARTICLE 52



LEGAL CONTINUITY





1. All treaties, conventions, agreements, concords, declarations, protocols and other ASEAN instruments which have been in effect before the entry into force of this Charter shall continue to be valid.​



UNCLOS ARTICLE 279



OBLIGATIONS TO SETTLE DISPUTES BY PEACEFUL MEANS BY HTSC





States Parties shall settle any dispute between them concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention by peaceful means in accordance with Article 2, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations and, to this end, shall seek a solution by the means indicated in Article 33, paragraph 1, of the Charter.





UNCLOS ARTICLE 289



EXPERTS





In any dispute involving scientific or technical matters, a court or tribunal exercising jurisdiction under this section may, at the request of a party or proprio motu, select in consultation with the parties no fewer than two scientific or technical experts chosen preferably from the relevant list prepared in accordance with Annex VIII, article 2, to sit with the court or tribunal but without the right to vote.



UNCLOS ANNEX VIII



SPECIAL ARBITRATION





Article 1 Institutions of Proceedings.


Article 2 List of Experts


Article 3 Constitution of Special Arbitral Tribunal


Article 4 General Provisions​


Article 5 Fact Finding



ROYAL SOVEREIGN CROWN
HOST OF ALL NATIONS





CENTRAL SOVEREIGN GOVERNMENT CITY OF SALVACION





THE BANNER OF WORLD PEACE



The Royal Sovereign Crown of the World Peace Treaty made the Flag and Heraldic Code of the Philippines transcend under Separability and Repeal Clause of RA 8491 expressing the principles of Sovereignty, Integrity and Lawful Jurisdiction. This is the Banner established by the World Peace Treaty symbolizing the fulfillment of World Peace, Unity and Prosperity among All Nations under Divine Providence.




OUR INDEPENDENT FOREIGN POLICY IS BASED ON ROYAL DECREE 01-4 PROTOCOL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW FOR AMITY OF ALL NATIONS UNDER DIVINE PROVIDENCE.


NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY
TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY
NATIONAL INTEREST
SELF-DETERMINATION

INTERNATIONAL LAW IS THE EQUALIZER OF ALL STATES



UNDER ROYAL DECREE 01-4 PROTOCOL


ASSERTING OUR NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY BY SECURING OUR TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY

TREATY OF CEBU 1565


HACIENDA FILIPINA AND THE WHOLE MAHARLIKHA




The Treaty of Cebu is a peace treaty signed on June 4, 1565 between Miguel López de Legazpi, representing King Philip II of Spain, and Rajah Tupas of Cebu. Deed of Forcible Entry, the whole of Maharlika 12-7-1565 partially cancelled 001-S1565 occupation, and occupation by Miguel Islands drafted document by Andres Urdaneta December 12, 1565 by the Royal Order of the King of Spain de Legazpi in favor of King renamed to Luisong "Luzon" Tagean as King Philip symbol of friendship II of Spain on January 5, 1566. In 1583, the Royal Audiencia de Manila was established as the Highest Tribunal for the Supreme Law of the Land.

SEE EVIDENCE HERE

TREATY OF PARIS 1764



INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE LAND, OWNERSHIP & OCCUPATION





Following the 1763 Treaty of Paris, the Original Certificate of Title No. T-01-4 in Fee Simple, decided under Civil Case 3957-P, was entered pursuant to Decree 01-4, protocol by virtue of the Supreme Order of the Royal Crown of England, and in accordance with the Order of the Royal Audiencia de Manila, with date January 17, 1764, issued at the Province of Manila, Philippine Islands, in a Case No. 571 of the said Court, and Case No. 572 in accordance with the Provisions of Land Laws as adopted Torrens System, resolved by Supreme Court 3rd Division in GR 171913 in 2012 to HRM Queen Salvacion Legaspi.


SEE EVIDENCE HERE

TREATY OF PEACE 1898



TRANSFER & REDEMPTION OF OUR SOVEREIGNTY





The Treaty of Peace, provided in 1935 Article 1, was signed Dec 10 1898 in Paris. Article 3 specified the transfer of our Sovereignty from Spain to US conducted by USMG under Law of Ownership, and Interim Status Condition under Law of Occupation, while Philippines had not yet reached its final political status, until the occupying power was legally supplanted, redeemed and occupied, together w/ all the islands embraced in the treaty at Washington in Nov 7 1900 and a treaty in Jan 2 1930 by US & Great Britain and all treaties under the Jurisdiction of International Law, for World Peace, Unity and Prosperity.


SEE EVIDENCE HERE

ALL TERRITORIES UNDER TREATIES SUBJECT TO INTERNATIONAL LAW ARE THE SCOPE OF THE WORLD PEACE TREATY.

IN 2016 SOUTH CHINA SEA ARBITRATION, BOTH THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA AND REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES ARE IN BREACH OF THE UN CHARTER FOR HAVING NO SUFFICIENT PROOF TO SUBSTANTIATE THEIR TERRITORIAL CLAIM.

AS CONFIRMED BY JUSTICE CARPIO, ONLY MARITIME DISPUTE WAS ADDRESSED IN THE 2016 RULING BUT NOT A RESOLUTION ON THE TERRITORIAL DISPUTE BECAUSE UNCLOS EVEN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE HAS NO JURISDICTION IN THE LAW OF THE LAND.

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES WAS VOIDED WITH ARTICLE 1 NATIONAL TERRITORY RIGHTS IN THE CONSTITUTION. IT IS ALSO A CORPORATE GOVERNMENT AS CLEARLY DEFINED IN THE EXECUTIVE ORDER 292 OF 1987.



PHILIPPINES IS THE LAND AND WEALTH OF THE LAND, THE PATRIMONY OF THE NATION.

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES IS AN INTERIM GOVERNMENT UNDER THE LAW OF OCCUPATION, ESTABLISHED BY THE UNITED STATES MILITARY GOVERNMENT SINCE THE 1898 PEACE TREATY AND STILL REGISTERED AT UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, TO BE CONSTITUTIONALLY REPLACED WITH THE SOVEREIGN REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, DECLARED AND DECREED BY THE ROYAL SOVEREIGN CROWN RESOLVED BY THE SUPREME COURT IN GR 171913. - Excerpt from Article 3 of the Treaty of Paris Cession Diagram.


EO 292 OF 1987
CESSION DIAGRAM
US SEC REGISTRATION
CAGRSP 70014 VOIDED THE REPUBLIC
GR 171913 ENTRY JUDGMENT
GR 171913 RESOLUTION



HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT



THE CONSTITUTIONAL DEJURE CROWN COURT


MAXIM LAW
UNIVERSAL LAW
NATURAL LAW
COMMON LAW
GOD'S LAW

GRANTED AS PRESCRIBED BY LAW, BY TESTATE AND INTESTATE SUCCESSION, BY TRANSMITTALS
AND BY SHERIFF'S WRIT OF EXECUTION ORDER, THE RESTORATION OF ROYAL AUDIENCIA DE MANILA DECREED SINCE MAY 5, 1583 SERVING AS THE HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT, GRANTOR OF SOVEREIGN RIGHTS TO ALL FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS EXERCISING JURISDICTION IN OUR NATIVE LAND, AND THE OVERSEER OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC MATTERS, WHO INFLUENCED THE ENTIRE JURISPRUDENCE IN THE WORLD, NOW IN CONTROL UNDER THE EXISTING LAW.





INDIGENOUS SOVEREIGNTY



AUTOCRATIC SOVEREIGN MONARCHY





PRINCIPALITY OF GOD'S AUTHORITY IN HIS LUPANG HINIRANG, HIS PROMISED KINGDOM, HIS PRECIOUS CREATION, MAHAL NA LIKHA, SINCE TIME IMMEMORIAL. THE LAND AND WEALTH OF THE LAND BELONGS ONLY TO GOD AND HIS SOVEREIGNTY, AS THE CENTRAL SOVEREIGN GOVERNMENT, TO HOST THE LAND AND WEALTH ENTITLEMENT OF THE EARTH, AS THE PATRIMONY OF THE NATION.



HISTORIC SOVEREIGNTY



CENTRAL SOVEREIGN GOVERNMENT





SINCE MAY 5, 1583, THE ROYAL AUDIENCIA SERVED AS THE GRANTOR OF SOVEREIGN RIGHTS TO ALL FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS EXERCISING JURISDICTION IN OUR NATIONAL TERRITORY, AND ALL TERRITORIES OF THE SPANISH CROWN, BRITISH CROWN TO UNITED STATES AS THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, IS NOW REDEEMED AND OCCUPIED BY KINGDOM FILIPINA HACIENDA.



WORLD SOVEREIGNTY



ROYAL SOVEREIGN CROWN





ALL TERRITORIES TURNED OVER BY THE SPANISH CROWN AND BRITISH CROWN INCLUDING THE UNITED STATES AND REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, ARE PART OF THE FEE SIMPLE TITLE "IN REM" AS ADOPTED TORRENS SYSTEM NOW OCCUPIED BY THE SOVEREIGNTY TO DEFEND AND PROTECT THE MOTHERLAND FOR PEACE, UNITY AND PROSPERITY UNDER DIVINE PROVIDENCE.





PRIVATE RIGHTS OF OWNERSHIP AND OCCUPATION
CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES RA 386


BOOK III. MODES OF ACQUIRING OWNERSHIP



Article 712: Ownership is acquired by occupation and by intellectual creation. Ownership and other real rights over property are acquired and transmitted by law, by donation, by testate and intestate succession, and in consequence of certain contracts, by tradition. They may also be acquired by means of prescription.



TITLE II. OWNERSHIP IN GENERAL



ARTICLE 427





Ownership may be exercised over things or rights.



ARTICLE 428





The owner has the right to enjoy and dispose of a thing, without other limitations than those established by law.



ARTICLE 429





The owner or lawful possessor of a thing has the right to exclude any person from the enjoyment and disposal thereof. For this purpose, he may use such force as may be reasonably necessary to repel or prevent an actual or threatened unlawful physical invasion or usurpation of his property.





WE SPEAK THE VOICE OF THE CONSTITUTION.
WE REPRESENT THE RULE OF LAW.
WE ARE THE PROVIDER OF LAW



AFFIRMING OUR POSITION AS THE SOVEREIGNTY.


US SEC Registration of the Corporate Republic of the Philippines
China in Favor of Philippine Claim of 1898 Treaty of Paris
ONLY THE SOVEREIGNTY HAS INTEGRITY AND JURISDICTION

THE ROYAL SOVEREIGN CROWN OF THE WORLD PEACE TREATY



The Philippine Archipelago referred to in the 1987 Article 1 are those mentioned in 1935 Article 1. - Annotation from the Article 1 of the 1987 Constitution Textbook by Hector de Leon


The limits of the Republic of the Philippines exercising jurisdiction in our National Territory are set forth in Article 3 of the Treaty of Paris - Article 1 of the 1935


Constitution Republic of the Philippines established by the United States Military Government is only under "Interim Status Condition" under the Law of Ownership and Occupation and will be legally replaced by the 1987 Constitution Transition Government established using the same Article 1 instruments. - Article 3 of the 1898 Treaty of Paris



THE BOOK OF REDEMPTION OF THE WORLD PEACE TREATY



The Secret Book of Redemption of the Treaty of Paris is finally revealed! It redeems God's Supreme Law and Ownership in His Promised Land and all the Wealth of the Land that has long been hidden since time immemorial.


It reveals the Blueprint of the Divine Plan with Definitive Codes of Redemption.


Highest Respect, Honor and Gratitude to Her Majesty Queen Salvacion, the Ark chosen by the Father to fulfill His Covenant in the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land for our Genuine Freedom of National Independence, for World Peace, Unity and Prosperity under Divine Providence.



TREATY OF PARIS IS FACTUALLY, LEGALLY AND HISTORICALLY CORRECT



All territories under treaties subject to International Law are the scope of the World Peace Treaty. In the 2016 South China Sea Arbitration, both the Peoples Republic of China and the Republic of the Philippines are in breach of the UN Charter for having no sufficient proof to substantiate their territorial claim. As confirmed by Justice Carpio, only the maritime dispute was addressed in the 2016 ruling but not a resolution on the territorial dispute because UNCLOS even the International Court of Justice has no jurisdiction in the Law of the Land.

Republic of the Philippines was voided with Article 1 National Territory rights in the 1987 Constitution. It is also a Corporate Government Entity as clearly defined in the Introductory Provisions of Executive Order 292 of 1987.



WEST PHILIPPINES SEA UPDATE



PCG COMMODORE STRESSED THAT INTERNATIONAL LAW IS THE EQUALIZER OF ALL STATES



CHINESE GENERAL XU HUI WORRIES ABOUT OTHER PARTIES' COMFORT LEVEL AND THE RISK OF RUINING PEACE TO END COLONIZATION HISTORY.



HIGHEST TRIBUNAL SUPREME COURT



CONSTITUTIONAL DEJURE CROWN COURT


HTSC ON FB